• About / Contact
  • Calculators and Visualizations
  • Economic Concepts
  • Advertise
  • Disclosure

Don't Quit Your Day Job...

The Intersection of Personal Finance, Economics, and Politics.

RSS
  • Personal Finance
    • Debt
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Health
  • Economics
    • Calculators
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Offbeat
    • Weekender
    • Books
    • Music
    • Sports
  • Real Estate
    • Bay Area
  • Technology

Revisiting Massive Leverage…

Posted By PK    Last updated July 20th, 2012 5 Comments

A few months back we talked about the (possibly) impending problems with the FHA reserve fund – namely, 417:1 leverage on their lending portfolio.  Now, with the Post Office threatening to steal the federal bailout show, let’s look at this issue from a different angle – namely, from the perspective of the borrower.

Taking Advantage of Cheap Government Money

In 30 Years We’ll Miss Our McMansions…

Let me explain a term to you… ‘Cheap Money’.  Cheap money isn’t really money at all… it refers to a loan or a line of credit with a long term and cheap borrowing rates.  Specifically, cheap money in the context of a mortgage would be a mortgage rate not much more expensive than the estimated path of inflation in the mid to far term future.  Today’s mortgage rates definitely apply.

Now, the third term I surreptitiously slipped into that title?  Government.  There is no doubt in my mind that Government (and yes, Federal Reserve) programs are holding mortgage rates at historical lows.

‘Cheap’ also implies that mortgage rates are actually lower than they would be without some sort of assistance.  Those last two links should convince you, but let me summarize here: the spread between inflation expectations and mortgage rates is almost impossibly low, and the spread between government re-insured mortgages and non-conforming mortgages is higher than normal.

In essence?  If you can get credit – and that’s an if, for some people in this market – rates are incredibly generous for anything in the medium to long term.  Rates are also cheap enough that you should push out along the curve.  That’s right – 30 year mortgages sound much better than 15 year mortgages right about now.

A Note on Low Down Payments…

While piggyback loans cut down on the number of households paying private mortgage insurance during the real estate bubble’s run, it’s now back in vogue.  Genworth Financial (along with QBE LMI, one of the two major PMI issuers) even reports that 26% of Americans surveyed were okay borrowing enough to require Private Mortgage Insurance – which is an especially popular option with the first time homebuyer crowd.

PMI is oft-misunderstood.  It does not pay your mortgage if you somehow miss the payments.  It does the opposite, actually – it insures against the lender’s risk of you not paying.  That doesn’t somehow make PMI grift – it’s merely a piece of the contract you enter into when purchasing a house.  You give up a fixed payment for the opportunity to borrow by putting less money at risk.  PMI allows cash poor (but cash-flow high) potential home-buyers to enter into the housing market years earlier than what would otherwise be possible.

The best way to look at PMI is an added cost on your loan.  It should be a piece of any effective APR disclosures you get.  Let’s say you’re looking at a home in San Francisco, 94112 and see a house for $500,000 (ha!).  Zillow‘s mortgage quote calculator is offering 3.375% effective on a 30 year loan with $100,000 down, while 10% down (and PMI) loan will only set you back a bit to give you an effective APR of 3.798%.  Not bad considering the history of mortgage rates!

So, About The Leverage?

I understand that for some people, credit is somewhat hard to get right now.  But… if you’ve got good credit?  Money is incredibly cheap, so don’t be afraid of long term debt.  Join the party!

Have you recently bought a home, or are you considering buying one?  Do you agree with my ‘cheap money’ point?  Have you ever paid private mortgage insurance?

Portions of this article promoted by Genworth Financial.


If you enjoyed this post, let others know!


Filed Under: Personal Finance, Real Estate Tagged With: first time homebuyer, inflation, mortgage, pmi

DQYDJ Email Newsletter

Like what you see on this post?

Get the new stuff before everyone else. Sign-up below.


Follow @twitterapi


  • freeby50

    I agree that now is a good time to borrow or refinance.

    PMI should definitely be avoid if possible. I would look at PMI as the additional cost to borrow >80%. Lets say you buy a house for $100k. You could put $20k down and avoid PMI and get a 3.75% loan. Or you could borrow another $10k and only have a 10% downpayment and then pay PMI. Your loan is still 3.75% but you also have to pay PMI to borrow that extra $10k. PMI would run you about $45 per month or $540 a year. Thats a cost of $540 to borrow $10,000. This is effectively like paying 9.15% interest on that $10k. 3.75% for the mortgage and 5.4% for the PMI.

    • http://www.dqydj.net/ PK

      Right – it does help to look at the last 10% (or 15%, or 16.5% for FHA), but there is one variable which makes PMI come out on top sometimes… it’s deductible if you make under $107,000.

      Since junior loans are usually north of 8% (if you can get them), it actually makes sense for some people to PMI instead of getting a piggyback loan.

      Narrow gap to hit, sure – but it’s not a “100% no”.

  • Dominique Brown

    I agree with your cheap money point. I recently refinanced my home to take advantage of the cheap / free money. Debt / Leverage is not interestedly bad you just have to purchase assets that will appreciate rather than depreciate in value. Only borrow in instances where you can make a profit. There is risk is not using leverage also :-)

    • http://www.dqydj.net/ PK

      Right – I stopped one step short of saying “free money, go get it!”… but I’m all for the cheap debt right now. I’m almost at the point where it’s worth refinancing my mortgage, unbelievably (I’m in the 4s). I’ll probably end up doing that in 2012, heh.

  • http://twitter.com/financialsamura Financial Samurai

    I’d like to keep a 1 million mortgage for as long as possible. Only costs $26,500 a year in interest now. Can’t even rent a 2/1 apartment in SF for that!

RSS Twitter Facebook Email

Connect

Subscribe to DQYDJ's RSS or Email feed:

Newest on DQYDJ

  • Canadian Real Estate: A Rapidly Inflating Bubble
  • Don’t Look Now – Rapidly Changing Mortgage and Predicted Inflation Rates!
  • The DQYDJ Weekender 6/15/2013
  • The Government, The Internet, and The Surveillance State – Graphed
  • Want to Be a Better Investor? Ask Your Wife!

DQYDJ’s Greatest Hits

  • Dr. S&P or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying About the Credit Rating Downgrade
  • Is Dave Ramsey’s Investment Advice Misguided?
  • Milton Friedman’s Permanent Income Hypothesis
  • Would You Lie to Your Partner About Money?
  • Real Bay Area Income and Home Calculator, 2011 Edition!
  • Should Art and Psychology Majors Pay Higher Student Loan Rates?
  • 45-49 Years Old: The Peak of Your Financial Prowess
  • Hedge Your Gas Prices!
  • Ranking the Fed Chairmen: Why Paul Volcker Was The Best (And Bernanke Isn’t Bad…)
  • Optimizing Bet Sizes with the Kelly Criterion

Links

  • The Frugal Toad
  • Control Your Cash
  • Hope to Prosper
  • The Free Financial Advisor
  • Stacking Benjamins
  • Financial Uproar
  • Modest Money
  • I Am One Percent
  • Len Penzo
  • Timeless Finance

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2013 Don't Quit Your Day Job...

Some links on this page are tied to affiliate programs. See our disclosure page for more information.