• About / Contact
  • Calculators and Visualizations
  • Economic Concepts
  • Advertise
  • Disclosure

Don't Quit Your Day Job...

The Intersection of Personal Finance, Economics, and Politics.

RSS
  • Personal Finance
    • Debt
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Health
  • Economics
    • Calculators
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Offbeat
    • Weekender
    • Books
    • Music
    • Sports
  • Real Estate
    • Bay Area
  • Technology

Payday Lending and Short-Term Liquidity

Posted By CameronDaniels    Last updated September 6th, 2012 3 Comments

Personal finance experts frequently tout the advantages of having a six month emergency fund, if not a more conservative twelve month fund. There are many reasons that a citizen would need to dip into their emergency savings: family illness, death, severe medical expenses, unplanned pregnancy or job loss to name a few. Many reports however, indicate that many (>25% or >50% depending on your definition) Americans still are not prepared for a downturn scenario.

Why this occurs is unclear. Perhaps it is the effect of a lingering economic malaise, a re-leveraging consumer debt market or a tendency to think too much about the present. One of the more likely reasons, however, is that many households simply do not have the capacity on the income side to maintain their lifestyle and are not prepared to make the sacrifices.

High APRs Can Guarantee Near 100% Approval

For households that encounter an event that would cause a need to jump into emergency savings, there are very few outlets to pursue. One is through Chapter 7 bankruptcy, which costs around $300. One of the benefits of this outlet is that medical expenses are treated as typical unsecured lending and are usually discharged (actual discharge rules are usually dictated by the states or the individual bankruptcy judge). I would, however, carefully weigh the pros and cons of declaring bankruptcy. With the recent changes to bankruptcy laws in 2005, an individual is only allowed to declare Chapter 7 once and this stays on your record for seven years, making it extremely difficult to secure lending for a car loan or house in the meantime. This would make the need to develop an emergency savings reservoir even more pressing (what if your car breaks down?) without the option for a second bankruptcy. Secondly, if the household contains a chronic debt using high earner, Chapter 7 has a means test proving that you have a low enough income not to be forced into Chapter 13. Chapter 13 strictly monitors your budget over a three- to five-year span and forces may obligations to remain in your name. Often, for high income earners this is the only option, but creditors do look at Chapter 13 bankruptcy as a slightly better indicator than Chapter 7.

Bankruptcy is a daunting ordeal and this writer would personally not suggest it if simply avoiding massive amounts of debt and tightening the household budget will do. There are cases, however, that with low revolving credit limits and low debt a massive medical bill or legal fee may warrant the need for short-term money. Traditional unsecured lending, such as credit cards, have stricter underwriting requirements (perhaps due to the fact of their federal regulation) and it may be difficult to qualify in time to address your short term funding gap. Secured lending, such as opening a HELOC or taking out a HEL, further leverages you and adds risk. Another issue: again, the time needed to obtain this funding may be too long and many households don’t own a home (or have $0 equity)!

Short-term money is then best handled by an institution specializing in short notice liquidity – such as a payday lending company or even a pawnshop (which issues secured loans). As a means to overcome a very short-term and infrequent shock to an individual household that it simply cannot withstand, payday lending from a place like Wonga payday loans is a far superior alternative to bankruptcy. So long as a household has the proper budget and standard inflows (income) outweigh standard outflows (expenses, rent, etc), then a payday loan is a decent answer to short-term liquidity issues. For many in this country there is no better option.

If any family budget is entirely dependent on payday loans to fuel their current lifestyle, sacrifices need to be made to avoid a debtor’s prison, consistently paying very high short-term debt fees. Some regulators target payday lending as a usurious form of lending, but I find it hard to personally condemn an industry where some estimates have placed a 30-day default rate at only around 6%, even after providing individuals the short-term liquidity that they need in times of desperation.  What’s worse – high APR borrowing… bankruptcy… or black market loan sharking?  You be the judge.

So the next time you’re shaking your head at a “quick loans no credit check” sign – consider the alternatives.

Cheers,

Cameron Daniels

Portions of this article promoted by our partners at CashEuroNetUK.

 


If you enjoyed this post, let others know!


Filed Under: Debt, Economics, Personal Finance Tagged With: APR, bankruptcy, bankruptcy judge, bankruptcy law, chapter 13, chapter 7, Debt, debt spiral, emergency, HEL, HELOC, liquidity, payday lending, payday loans, Personal Finance, savings, unsecured lending, unsecured loans, usury

DQYDJ Email Newsletter

Like what you see on this post?

Get the new stuff before everyone else. Sign-up below.


Follow @twitterapi


  • freeby50

    ” Traditional unsecured lending, such as credit cards, have stricter
    underwriting requirements (perhaps due to the fact of their federal
    regulation)”

    Is the bit about federal regulation a reference to the brand new rules enacted in the past few years? Or have there been federal rules that stop credit card companies from extending credit to some people for some reason?

    If federal regulations made it more difficult to get credit cards then I’d be puzzled how I got so many of them as an unemployed, broke college student.

    • http://www.dqydj.net/ PK

      Cameron has much better visibility into that than me, but I think in this instance he is talking about the Credit CARD Act of 2009.

      • freeby50

        The CARD act is the new one I was thinking off. Still as far as I know it didn’t limit the banks in giving out cards except for the case of teenagers or college students with no money. But maybe theres details I’m unaware of.

RSS Twitter Facebook Email

Connect

Subscribe to DQYDJ's RSS or Email feed:

Newest on DQYDJ

  • Canadian Real Estate: A Rapidly Inflating Bubble
  • Don’t Look Now – Rapidly Changing Mortgage and Predicted Inflation Rates!
  • The DQYDJ Weekender 6/15/2013
  • The Government, The Internet, and The Surveillance State – Graphed
  • Want to Be a Better Investor? Ask Your Wife!

DQYDJ’s Greatest Hits

  • Are Incomes in the United States Becoming More Unequal?
  • Substitution vs. Income Effect (and its Implications)
  • Hedge Your Gas Prices!
  • Milton Friedman’s Permanent Income Hypothesis
  • The Fundamental Problem With Financial Models
  • Occupy Wall Street: Follow the Money to See Which Political Party Benefits!
  • Uncle Sam the CEO: Visualization of IRS Revenues Collected 1960-2010
  • How Did Mitt Romney Get a $20.7 Million IRA?
  • All About Credit Cards and the Perfect Credit Card Spending Strategy
  • Is It Possible to Beat The Stock Market?

Links

  • Political Calculations
  • The Millionaire Nurse Blog
  • Free By 50
  • Len Penzo
  • Makin' Sense Babe
  • Timeless Finance
  • Hope to Prosper
  • The Frugal Toad
  • Burbed
  • Money Mamba

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2013 Don't Quit Your Day Job...

Some links on this page are tied to affiliate programs. See our disclosure page for more information.