• About / Contact
  • Calculators and Visualizations
  • Economic Concepts
  • Advertise
  • Disclosure

DQYDJ.net

Don't Quit Your Day Job: The Intersection of Personal Finance, Economics, and Politics.

RSS
  • Personal Finance
    • Debt
    • Retirement
    • Taxes
    • Health
  • Economics
    • Calculators
  • Politics
  • Investing
  • Offbeat
    • Weekender
    • Books
    • Music
    • Sports
  • Real Estate
    • Bay Area
  • Technology

The DQYDJ Weekender, 11/3/2012

Posted By PK    Last updated November 3rd, 2012 4 Comments

Let’s call this the ‘Election Edition’?  It’s November 3rd, so it’s the last chance you’ve got to read my snark before 40 counties in 9 states choose the most powerful man in the world.  Aren’t you excited?

Regardless, I hope you tune into our live-blog Tuesday.  We’ll bring our irreverent A-game to the 2012 election live-blog, featuring, at a minimum, Cameron and me.

Links We Liked!

  • Nelson at Financial Uproar had a piece on small cap stocks and why to invest in them (peppered with his trademark sexual innuendos!).  Go read it… I’ll wait.
  • We at DQYDJ have made no secret of our problems with the PPACA.  That’s why we read the series at 101 Centavos about accepting the new health care law with great interest.  Remember: acceptance is the fifth stage of grief in the Kübler-Ross model!
  • A title that speaks for itself, from Control Your Cash: “Price Gouging Doesn’t Exist, And You’re An Idiot.“
  • Len Penzo had an interesting 100 word post on early risers.  Guess what?  Rising early correlates with success – beat your competition y waking up before them!  (No comment on living on the West Coast when you have East Coast friends).
  • The Financial Samurai’s neighbor bought an expensive new car… but don’t worry, he doesn’t feel the need to match him dollar for dollar in spending.  Great usage of the phrase “bank of mom and dad” in this one!
  • Our pal Paula at Afford Anything had a multiple-photo entry on renovating a triplex, which we loved.  We’d also love to do a post with more than a stock photo – maybe I’ll do one soon (remember I promised home renovation photos?  Yeah, I’ll get to them eventually).
  • Our friend Dave at 6400 Personal Finance started a series (a concept that he looks down upon, hilariously) about how to invest successfully.  Stay tuned!

Links To Us

  • Hope to Prosper
  • Financial Uproar
  • The Free Financial Advisor

Apologies folks, we’re writing a ton of politics article lately (want to guess why?).  No carnival submissions – unless you know a place we can submit these things?

Closing Thoughts

Eric at DollarVersity posted a long piece about blogger responsibility after reading some dubious (read: incorrect) advice about charitable deductions.  His conclusion?  You shouldn’t comment on anything you aren’t an expert on.

To the example that triggered the piece (click through, it’s about a deduction): yeah, it’s dumb.  There is no deduction which ‘saves’ you money; you always spend more in total than the deduction saves you (we don’t have greater than 100% tax rates, yet). And yes, we have disclaimers when we discuss certain topics – and disclosures when we talk about stocks.  The bigger question is: should “non-experts” continue to post on a wide range of topics?

Let me play the contrarian here…  People wouldn’t read this site if I only talked about programming languages all day (or if Cameron talked only about credit quality and Bryan talked about 3D printing).  Truth is, we’re not ‘qualified’, in either a government sanctioned or degree holding sense, to talk to you about 98.8% of what we talk to you about.  What we do have is a keen sense of the absurd, mildly elevated IQs, and slick math skills – which qualifies us to talk about how we personally have optimized our own spending, earning, and taxing decisions.  Oh, and offbeat articles, politics, and real estate.

But why do we need qualifications to comment on something?  If you think that what someone says is stupid, vote with your feet (fingers) and stop listening (reading).  If you’re so inclined, comment and correct the mistake.  However, I don’t have an issue if someone tells me their strategy to do something, even if they don’t have a University or Government blessing to do so.  People don’t check if I have a real estate license before they ask me about my house buying strategy, or ask to see my contractor’s license before borrowing my tools.  California doesn’t even ask me if I majored in Political Science before I vote.

Truth is, there are plenty of people who have incredible things to say about topics that they weren’t formally trained to talk about.  Engineers become CEOs or go into consulting, Business Majors sell houses, English Majors program microcontrollers.  In some more well known examples, PhD Chemists (and practicing MDs) write some of the most influential financial books of all time, Psychologists win Economics Nobel Prizes, and dyslexic High School drop-outs become billionaire owners of companies in hundreds of fields.

In fact, I’m going to do some plumbing today, despite my lack of training.  And we at DQYDJ will continue to comment on topics where we are not technically experts (as we promised you).

No promises I won’t start posting articles on C++ though…


If you enjoyed this post, let others know!


Filed Under: Weekender

DQYDJ Email Newsletter

Like what you see on this post?

Get the new stuff before everyone else. Sign-up below.


Follow @twitterapi


  • http://www.dollarversity.com Eric J. Nisall – DollarVersity

    I’m honored to have drawn such a prominent retort! I just have one thing to say: my issue isn’t with anyone discussing or opining on any subject, but rather with people who flat out give advice on subjects they clearly don’t understand or have any experience with (ie: the plainly incomplete tax deduction advice). There’s a distinction that needs to be recognized the two. Plus, all of the examples you gave all have relevant expertise and qualifications relative to the specific accomplishments, even if it may not be a direct or obvious connection.

    • http://www.dqydj.net/ PK

      My pleasure; thanks for writing something interesting instead of a summary of how much debt you paid off in October.

      I’m with you – but that example is especially egregious because anyone who has ever claimed a charitable deduction knows that you have to itemize to take it. (Here’s how I learned: I donated to charities in college and didn’t save a penny on my taxes). In the real world, California is pretty much an automatic Schedule A state, but if I said “you can write off charitable donations”, I would obviously add the caveat that “if you have enough in deductions to itemize on your tax return”. And of course I agree that individual advice is a horrible idea – that’s where I punt on this site (also, I don’t want a ton of people asking me which stocks to pick!).

      As to my examples – my point is that none of those people had experience in other subjects. They gained it through nothing more than intellectual curiosity (and in one case, for billions of dollars). Take someone like Janet Reno, for example – at some point she switched from Chemistry (her undergraduate degree) to a path which led her to Attorney General. I’m not saying that the author in your example is a mega-genius Renaissance Man who will shake up the practice with revolutionary ideas using nothing more than the skills learned during his Liberal Arts education. I’m saying that telling people to not talk about things they didn’t formally specialize in is a dangerous path. What’s the endgame? Licensing for bloggers? I much prefer that people like us – people with the facilities to know when advice is bunk – keep people honest.

      I know I’m being facetious now, but there is one major in which your entire career is spent writing about stuff you don’t know about… Journalism!

  • Funancials

    Those who can, do. Those who can’t, blog about it.

    • http://www.dqydj.net/ PK

      “Those who can’t, teach. Those who can’t teach, teach gym.” (No offense to any of my physical education instructors.)

      Maybe that’s why I don’t write about C++?

RSS Twitter Facebook Email

Connect

Subscribe to DQYDJ's RSS or Email feed:

Newest on DQYDJ

  • Why Everyone Should Care About Privacy
  • The Stacking Benjamins Podcast
  • The DQYDJ Weekender, 5/18/2013
  • The Saturday Powerball Drawing: You Do Not Have a Positive Expected Value!
  • Predicting S&P 500 Closing Prices – May, 2013

DQYDJ’s Greatest Hits

  • Racial Bias in Foul Rates among NBA Referees
  • Occupy Wall Street: How Much Do Republicans and Democrats Invest in Wall Street Firms?
  • Optimizing Bet Sizes with the Kelly Criterion
  • Is It Possible to Beat The Stock Market?
  • Is Social Security a Good Investment?
  • The Fundamental Problem With Financial Models
  • How Did Mitt Romney Get a $20.7 Million IRA?
  • Supply and Demand (And Other Economic Arguments Against the Minimum Wage)
  • Which Political Demographics Watch Which Sports?
  • Dr. S&P or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying About the Credit Rating Downgrade

Sponsors


Proud Member of YakezieInvest Some Savings in a Peer to Peer MarketplaceAdvertise on DQYDJOnline - Save 15% on H&R Block At Home ProductsTurboTax is Easy, Free Edition, Fast Refund

Links

  • The Frugal Toad
  • Free By 50
  • The Free Financial Advisor
  • Len Penzo
  • Your Finances Simplified
  • Timeless Finance
  • Burbed
  • Modest Money
  • Careful Cents
  • Money Mamba

Return to top of page

Copyright © 2013 Don't Quit Your Day Job...

Some links on this page are tied to affiliate programs. See our disclosure page for more information.